Gabriel Encinas Cruz
March 2010
Santa Cruz de Tenerife
Since very little was curious to know the causes of everyday phenomena. I wondered what to gasoline for a car to work. It would have been nine when I realized that the sound took some time to take a tour (a friend was beaten on a rock and I heard him when he raised his hand).
Contemplating the amount of seawater inferred that water would be composed of balls which rolled between them. I thought the centrifugal force could be harnessed as an energy source. (Imagine some devices to tap into this force). When I was eighteen I started reading the treaty physics KLEIBER-KARSTEN I opened a new world. On one occasion I found some loose papers of an article on ether and its contradictions, hence I got the idea that what traveling in space is not matter but energy.
UNIVERSE REAL AND APPARENT
We observed that the earth is flat, which is at rest, the moon and the stars revolve around it. The scientific reality is that the Earth is spherical, which turns around and travels through space with a speed of 30 km / s. The scientific reality differs from our concept of natural phenomena.
We can not deny that the reality we observe is very different from scientific truth, which is why we must admit that in the Universe there are two truths: one, stick to the facts as we see and feel, and again, as admitting the reality has drawn a scientific way, so for us there must be a real universe (the scientist) and an apparent (which shows the natural phenomena as we see or intuit)
When we look carefully at the nature we find details that do not match our idea of reality and this has led us to imagine other cases which, although at first glance seem contradictory, may be the real reality. To explain the movement of stars around the Earth was thought that this was not flat but spherical, turning on whether, and also traveled through the area. These ideas that today we accept as true, were not always considered and took sacrifices and tears are accepted as truths.
There are ideas that seem silly but, can that fit the actual reality. I refer to ideas that have emerged in my mind and that I believe may have some truth.
I assume that the bodies that travel through space, could not cross it like a ship across the sea. These bodies would have the power and it would be creating that travels in its path, the material body. The ship crosses the sea water away. The bodies cross the area without it aside.
This form of movement which I call "evolution of matter. I compare this form of displacement with a wave at sea.
The kinetic energy of wind, acting in the sea, produces traveling waves that we see over the sea, however, that in itself is not traveling wave, but the kinetic energy that formed it. The wave is successively reproducing itself with the kinetic energy of wind acting on the water. The water rises and falls just as the shape of the wave moves accompanied by this energy.
In some ways, the evolution of the bodies will not cause too much surprise if we refer to both rigid bodies. Another thing is when it comes to us as a material body we are. Our body moves in space. Our body will be constantly leaving to then reproduce itself. In movies and television we see the bodies and people are continuously moving, yet we know they are still frames successively passing fairly quickly without grasping the jump between each frame that follows.
Similarly, we are constantly changing and we do not notice. Every second our body is different. When you have spent long periods of time we find that our body has aged and we are really different. What we refer to here as evolution is the most intimate and small matter. If we are unable to capture images breaks in the movies or on television, will become less so in this case, where the jumps are infinitesimally small.
The evolution of matter in space allows us to explain the inertia of bodies in a way that persuasive.
The inertia of bodies has its rationale in which the energy of your mass is "evolving" in the area successively creating the material body. The higher velocity of the body, major transformation in its evolutionary process. This process requires an input of energy. If there were such a process, the bodies would have no inertia. The fact that to accelerate a body requires a certain energy, and reduce speed to release this is, in my opinion, proof that energy was part of the evolution of the material body.
As an example we can put a special wagon is equipped inside of some inertial flywheels coupled external gear wheels and travels rack rails on which gear their sprockets. When traveling the trolley sprockets are forced to turn and turn, rotate the inertial flywheels that accumulate inside rotation kinetic energy of motion of the trolley. If the sprocket gear on the rack, the cumulated inertial flywheels itself the kinetic energy of motion. If not geared sprocket, inertial flyers not swivel and not acknowledge the effect of inertia.
In a similar way, if a body to travel "gear" in Space, the body will have inertia. If the body material is not "geared" in Space, the body will not have inertia.
In the subsequent writings I have done on the evolution of matter have always said that evolution could explain the inertia of bodies. In this work attempt, to my mind, reason and understand the inertia and, in my convincing reasoning, this would help to reaffirm my view on the evolution of bodies in space.
Surprisingly, using a momentum to accelerate a body and turn east, to slow us back the energy we spend on that act. That energy was needed for the body to produce the desired development. In the example of the cart, that energy (kinetic energy) is stored in the internal inertial flywheels and they tend to move the van when we try to reduce their speed. It seems an obvious fact that the energy consumed is concentrated within the body and part of its mass. It is inconceivable that the energy required for a body acquires a certain speed is limited to just that, a mobile speed, but that is irrelevant in the integrity of the body in question.
If the example I give for inertia is right this means that evolution is real bodies in the universe and what is the energy travels, not the bodies themselves, that is: the stars and planets are only clusters energy traveling through space with varying speed. Obvious the vast amount of energy that travels through space and makes us think what will that energy? Is it something immensely big and powerful and will be insignificant and small?
E / D x n (a) E/2D x n (b)
In (a) represent a unit of energy E which has as denominator.
In (b) we have to 2E, twice as much energy as in (a) accompanied by the same denominator. The number "n" which multiplies the denominator D can be infinitely large, thus the value of energy E would be infinitely small.
If the denominator is infinitely large, the energy E could be close to zero, we know what happens when you multiply zero by another number but this is immensely large. In truth, we do not know the denominator of the energy and most likely you will be infinitely large (the denominator is given by the special conditions of space) so that the energy would be imperceptible in the universe but, at our level or from an obvious reality.
SPACE
We call "empty space" to the airless space we find when we left Earth. This area has important physical properties, so that vacuum is not so empty, there is "nothing". If so, the bodies would have no inertia, and without effort, it could drive. The fact that to accelerate a body requires a force, is a reason to think that force is necessary to modify the resting state of the body, to ensure that it evolves in space.
In space, we consider vacuum, spreads light and radio waves, there is gravity and inertia and is the basis of the electric and magnetic fields, and energy accumulates forming bodies with mass.
In my opinion, is a contradiction in the body travel through the "empty space" without more. It is more reasonable than traveling of these bodies is the energy of their masses, which in turn, are creating on their way the material body. If the space a total vacuum, "nothing", there would be the evolution of matter and it would not exist as such.
Attraction and repulsion between BODIES
The fact that the bodies, by electric or magnetic means, it will attract or repel, may have its justification in the "evolution" of matter.
When a body moves, it means that the energy of the mass "evolve" in that direction.
The matter of a body "evolves" toward the Space where the conditions for its "evolution" they do best, and repels that are unfavorable. A fire spreads ( "evolve") in the direction in which fuel is burned, and not otherwise.
COMMENT
I believe that the "evolution" of bodies is something real. In the waves, it becomes clear that the kinetic energy of wind, and not really the wave travels material itself as such. With regard to the sound, we could say that his energy is being spread by air or by solid or liquid to give us the impression that the sound is traveling and not their energy.
In relation to the light might say that his energy travels at three hundred thousand kilometers per second and say that this is the speed of light.
For many, it is perhaps somewhat understandable that traveling from one body is the energy of its mass and not the body itself. There are examples of transporting the bodies energy without changing their place, as we just saw. On the other hand there are examples where you see something that seems obvious is not as it seems.
So far, my opinion about the inertia and the evolution of bodies in space.
I appreciate suggestions on this subject in the e-mail: persianboy191919@yahoo.es or gabiyang@terra.es; or Mobile: 629 025 690
March 2010
Santa Cruz de Tenerife
Since very little was curious to know the causes of everyday phenomena. I wondered what to gasoline for a car to work. It would have been nine when I realized that the sound took some time to take a tour (a friend was beaten on a rock and I heard him when he raised his hand).
Contemplating the amount of seawater inferred that water would be composed of balls which rolled between them. I thought the centrifugal force could be harnessed as an energy source. (Imagine some devices to tap into this force). When I was eighteen I started reading the treaty physics KLEIBER-KARSTEN I opened a new world. On one occasion I found some loose papers of an article on ether and its contradictions, hence I got the idea that what traveling in space is not matter but energy.
UNIVERSE REAL AND APPARENT
We observed that the earth is flat, which is at rest, the moon and the stars revolve around it. The scientific reality is that the Earth is spherical, which turns around and travels through space with a speed of 30 km / s. The scientific reality differs from our concept of natural phenomena.
We can not deny that the reality we observe is very different from scientific truth, which is why we must admit that in the Universe there are two truths: one, stick to the facts as we see and feel, and again, as admitting the reality has drawn a scientific way, so for us there must be a real universe (the scientist) and an apparent (which shows the natural phenomena as we see or intuit)
When we look carefully at the nature we find details that do not match our idea of reality and this has led us to imagine other cases which, although at first glance seem contradictory, may be the real reality. To explain the movement of stars around the Earth was thought that this was not flat but spherical, turning on whether, and also traveled through the area. These ideas that today we accept as true, were not always considered and took sacrifices and tears are accepted as truths.
There are ideas that seem silly but, can that fit the actual reality. I refer to ideas that have emerged in my mind and that I believe may have some truth.
I assume that the bodies that travel through space, could not cross it like a ship across the sea. These bodies would have the power and it would be creating that travels in its path, the material body. The ship crosses the sea water away. The bodies cross the area without it aside.
This form of movement which I call "evolution of matter. I compare this form of displacement with a wave at sea.
The kinetic energy of wind, acting in the sea, produces traveling waves that we see over the sea, however, that in itself is not traveling wave, but the kinetic energy that formed it. The wave is successively reproducing itself with the kinetic energy of wind acting on the water. The water rises and falls just as the shape of the wave moves accompanied by this energy.
In some ways, the evolution of the bodies will not cause too much surprise if we refer to both rigid bodies. Another thing is when it comes to us as a material body we are. Our body moves in space. Our body will be constantly leaving to then reproduce itself. In movies and television we see the bodies and people are continuously moving, yet we know they are still frames successively passing fairly quickly without grasping the jump between each frame that follows.
Similarly, we are constantly changing and we do not notice. Every second our body is different. When you have spent long periods of time we find that our body has aged and we are really different. What we refer to here as evolution is the most intimate and small matter. If we are unable to capture images breaks in the movies or on television, will become less so in this case, where the jumps are infinitesimally small.
The evolution of matter in space allows us to explain the inertia of bodies in a way that persuasive.
The inertia of bodies has its rationale in which the energy of your mass is "evolving" in the area successively creating the material body. The higher velocity of the body, major transformation in its evolutionary process. This process requires an input of energy. If there were such a process, the bodies would have no inertia. The fact that to accelerate a body requires a certain energy, and reduce speed to release this is, in my opinion, proof that energy was part of the evolution of the material body.
As an example we can put a special wagon is equipped inside of some inertial flywheels coupled external gear wheels and travels rack rails on which gear their sprockets. When traveling the trolley sprockets are forced to turn and turn, rotate the inertial flywheels that accumulate inside rotation kinetic energy of motion of the trolley. If the sprocket gear on the rack, the cumulated inertial flywheels itself the kinetic energy of motion. If not geared sprocket, inertial flyers not swivel and not acknowledge the effect of inertia.
In a similar way, if a body to travel "gear" in Space, the body will have inertia. If the body material is not "geared" in Space, the body will not have inertia.
In the subsequent writings I have done on the evolution of matter have always said that evolution could explain the inertia of bodies. In this work attempt, to my mind, reason and understand the inertia and, in my convincing reasoning, this would help to reaffirm my view on the evolution of bodies in space.
Surprisingly, using a momentum to accelerate a body and turn east, to slow us back the energy we spend on that act. That energy was needed for the body to produce the desired development. In the example of the cart, that energy (kinetic energy) is stored in the internal inertial flywheels and they tend to move the van when we try to reduce their speed. It seems an obvious fact that the energy consumed is concentrated within the body and part of its mass. It is inconceivable that the energy required for a body acquires a certain speed is limited to just that, a mobile speed, but that is irrelevant in the integrity of the body in question.
If the example I give for inertia is right this means that evolution is real bodies in the universe and what is the energy travels, not the bodies themselves, that is: the stars and planets are only clusters energy traveling through space with varying speed. Obvious the vast amount of energy that travels through space and makes us think what will that energy? Is it something immensely big and powerful and will be insignificant and small?
E / D x n (a) E/2D x n (b)
In (a) represent a unit of energy E which has as denominator.
In (b) we have to 2E, twice as much energy as in (a) accompanied by the same denominator. The number "n" which multiplies the denominator D can be infinitely large, thus the value of energy E would be infinitely small.
If the denominator is infinitely large, the energy E could be close to zero, we know what happens when you multiply zero by another number but this is immensely large. In truth, we do not know the denominator of the energy and most likely you will be infinitely large (the denominator is given by the special conditions of space) so that the energy would be imperceptible in the universe but, at our level or from an obvious reality.
SPACE
We call "empty space" to the airless space we find when we left Earth. This area has important physical properties, so that vacuum is not so empty, there is "nothing". If so, the bodies would have no inertia, and without effort, it could drive. The fact that to accelerate a body requires a force, is a reason to think that force is necessary to modify the resting state of the body, to ensure that it evolves in space.
In space, we consider vacuum, spreads light and radio waves, there is gravity and inertia and is the basis of the electric and magnetic fields, and energy accumulates forming bodies with mass.
In my opinion, is a contradiction in the body travel through the "empty space" without more. It is more reasonable than traveling of these bodies is the energy of their masses, which in turn, are creating on their way the material body. If the space a total vacuum, "nothing", there would be the evolution of matter and it would not exist as such.
Attraction and repulsion between BODIES
The fact that the bodies, by electric or magnetic means, it will attract or repel, may have its justification in the "evolution" of matter.
When a body moves, it means that the energy of the mass "evolve" in that direction.
The matter of a body "evolves" toward the Space where the conditions for its "evolution" they do best, and repels that are unfavorable. A fire spreads ( "evolve") in the direction in which fuel is burned, and not otherwise.
COMMENT
I believe that the "evolution" of bodies is something real. In the waves, it becomes clear that the kinetic energy of wind, and not really the wave travels material itself as such. With regard to the sound, we could say that his energy is being spread by air or by solid or liquid to give us the impression that the sound is traveling and not their energy.
In relation to the light might say that his energy travels at three hundred thousand kilometers per second and say that this is the speed of light.
For many, it is perhaps somewhat understandable that traveling from one body is the energy of its mass and not the body itself. There are examples of transporting the bodies energy without changing their place, as we just saw. On the other hand there are examples where you see something that seems obvious is not as it seems.
So far, my opinion about the inertia and the evolution of bodies in space.
I appreciate suggestions on this subject in the e-mail: persianboy191919@yahoo.es or gabiyang@terra.es; or Mobile: 629 025 690
